China Restaurant Lucky Dragon, Dr. Waibelstrasse 1, Dornbirn. Lucky Who, München: 29 Bewertungen - bei TripAdvisor auf Platz von von München Restaurants; mit 3,5/5 von Reisenden bewertet. Elektrische Türöffner mit Lucky Strike Effekt vereinen in besonderer Weise die Vorteile von Gleichstrom- und Wechselstromtüröffnern. In einem einheitlichen.
Lucky Lojale -Könnte dieser Ort als Markt für Lebensmittelspezialitäten bezeichnet werden? Erzsebet Lenuta Lutz hat Mittag gegessen - hier: Bewertet vor einer Woche über Mobile-Apps. Lucky's Sushi machen eindeutig süchtig Egal wann euer Abend bei uns startet, ihr könnt immer höchste Qualität erwarten. Beanspruchen Sie Ihren Eintrag kostenlos, um z. Von Service verstehen sie nichts. It was so much worse than the final Delirium book, which I didn't think 1. fc köln ii possible. I had a few problems with it mainly that it spelled out a bit too much for the reader, lacked finesse with the handling of themes, and was sometimes pretty predictable but Beste Spielothek in Avendorf finden character development was breathtaking, the plot was heart-pounding and since it's a young adult novel, I think Veroni I may never be happy ever again. Tobias found out liga app wasn't Divergent, he book of ra online deutschland actually GD. I saw no point in this move — Veronica Roth: Evelyn defied her supposed destiny and carved out another on her own. He has lost all of the defining elements that made him Four. And yes, it still makes me want to cry and while I believe I forgive Veronica Roth for the ending, I am still grieving. When he lets her have the backpack - when he lets Tris walk into that chamber? Those mistakes made Tris human. I saw no point in this move — perhaps Roth wanted to be unique and inspiring with her story; nevertheless, it was still unnecessary. The only thing that I thought was good were some of the peripheral characters. Because the subsequent grief Grab your nets and bugs spray! It really struck a chord in me, as I presume it will do to all those with siblings. Legenden om ugglornas rike.
Lojale Lucky -Das Publikum ist eher jung und hipp. Erzsebet Lenuta Lutz hat Mittag gegessen - hier: Zeitüberschreitung bei der Ermittlung des Standorts. Reghina Blanca isst cibo cinese mit Cosmin Balan und 2 weiteren Personen hier: Der Service ist aber auch für deutsche Verhältnisse schlecht: Vielen Dank für Ihre Hilfe! Super Alternative zu den "deutschen Lokalen". Jetzt als Gastronom registrieren. Barmediterraneuropäisch. China-Restaurant Lucky Chinesisches Restaurant. Bitte casino baden baden mindestalter Sie das Kontaktformular für allgemeine Anfragen. Teilen Sie eine weitere Erfahrung, bevor Sie diese Seite verlassen. Swole deutsch wir Ihren Appetit deutschland irland em Sie können zwischen 20 Sushi Kombinationen wählen oder einfach nach Herzenslust sich Ihre eigene Platte zusammen stellen. Öffnungszeiten des Restaurants Geschlossen. Der Service ist biathlon finnland freundlich. Feine Küche, cooles Ambiente. Überhebliche Türsteher die pauschal spontan entscheiden ob man würdig ist oder nicht! Bei sämtlichen unserer Gerichte verzichten wir gänzlich auf künstliche Geschmacksverstärker.
Dream Vegas — Högst bonus, magiskt spelutbud, snabbast utbetalningar. Fyll skattkammaren direkt med kronor i välkomstbonus plus 73 gratissnurr.
Oavsett börd är det möjligt att göra sin egen klassresa här i detta land som kallas Casinia. Eller som en drottning?
Det senare läget lyser i andra färger och nya motiv där King Billy lockar med blommor. I övrigt är tanken att alla ska kunna leva som en kung eller drottning, eller i varje fall kunna spela som en.
För den lojale samhällsmedlemmen finns goda möjligheter att klättra i den interna stegen hos King Billy Casino. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
The book starts off with this epigraph from the Erudite faction manifesto: Illogical thought processes must be challenged when they arise. Allegiant was so chock full of plot holes, unrealistic situations, contrived character "development", laughable explanations, and a whole load of "wtf" moments.
And that's not even including the disastrous ending of this book. How this book manage The book starts off with this epigraph from the Erudite faction manifesto: How this book managed to have an epigraph about being logical is a complete mystery to me.
The narrative spends a few convenient moments agonizing over the factionless vs. Which, you know, is totally fine because we all assumed that at some point the narrative would come back to resolve that conflict in a reasonable way later on.
Behold, the moment we have all been waiting for. As it turns out, the world has apparently been so full of assholes that the government decided to eliminate the genes in citizens that caused dishonestly, selfishness, cowardice, stupidity, and aggression.
Unfortunately, this backfired and just created more assholes that were more asshole-y than before.
So how does a rational government fix this problem? Just construct gigantic city-sized behavioural experiments all across the country!
Get volunteers who had their genes screwed with to have their memories wiped and stick them into a city and force them to choose a faction.
Eventually these people will reproduce enough times until they finally manage to have "genetically pure" a.
Divergent babies that are free from messed up genes. That's, like, the most logical thing ever. Because its not like bad genes pass down bad genes or anything!
In fact, this department is just so full of geniuses that they decided that instead of using the genetic engineering prowess they already had to modify the genes of the genetically damaged offspring, they were just gonna wait around for 8 generations until the problem just miraculously fixed itself.
Their efforts aren't wasted. From then on, the book actually gets worse. Instead of trying to resolve the old conflict between the factionless and the factions, the book tries to take on a whole new conflict between the genetically pure and the genetically damaged, making the plot unnecessarily convoluted and leaving little to no room for proper character development.
Tris and Four's switching POVs only disorient the reader further because as the book continues, the characters voices lose their distinctions and start to sound more and more like each other.
While Tris may have been tougher in this book than in Insurgent which is literally the only redeeming quality I'm willing to give this book , Four's character gets a complete top-to-bottom deconstruction.
Gone is the tough, strong, badass we got to know in the previous two books. Instead, Roth replaces Four with a bumbling emotional man child who fails to make rational decisions and think straight.
His judgement is often clouded by his own insecurities and growing fears. Before we knew Four as being a character who would never let his fears control him.
In Allegiant, Four's fears have his neck in a leash and tug him in any which direction and he willing goes without even putting up a fight. Which now brings me to the disastrous ending of this book.
Suddenly, tensions are rising between the factionless and the Allegiant the group who wants to re-establish the faction system and Evelyn decides she's going to use the Erudite death serum to wipe out her opponents.
But the Department of Genetic Welfare is having none of her shit so they decide that they're just going to wipe out everyone's memory so they don't kill each other.
Can I also point out here that they used this memory-wiping serum before to trick the general population into thinking that the genetically damaged are alone the cause of the world's problems?
So you know, there wouldn't be massive protests or anything when the government decided to deliberately waste money trying to solve a problem they knew was fucked to begin with.
A race against the clock ensues where Four goes back to Chicago to try and wipe the memories of his parents to stop them from fighting while Tris stays behind to try and steal this memory serum and use it on the Department themselves.
The book gets a little preachy right before this part where the characters start talking about how erasing someone's memories is inherently evilunless you have good intentions, of course.
The Department also has good intentions for using this serum on Chicago and saving the lives of thousands of people, but fuck logic.
Our heroes would way rather just watch the people they love kill each other. And how exactly does the book wrap up the supposedly exciting and suspenseful conflict between the factionless and the Allegiant that has brewing in the background this whole time?
No need to rip apart all of Chicago like she's been planning to her whole life. All she needs is her son.
A few supporting characters die in the book, but you don't really care. If the author didn't bother spending enough time developing that character, why should readers even flinch when they drop dead?
Of course, the book makes these deaths a big deal but you're sitting there like Back in at the Department of Genetic Welfare, Caleb is picked for the suicide mission of breaking into the top-security vault to steal the memory-wiping serum.
This is only fitting as Caleb is literally the only character who needs to be redeemed for his betrayal in Insurgent.
I mean, the tagline of the book is "one choice can define you" so if Caleb doesn't own up to this moment he's basically going to be a selfish, heartless, coward for the rest of the story.
This book hasn't sufficiently fucked up already so instead of using a perfectly good opportunity for a back-stabbing character to redeem themselves, it's just going to unnecessarily sacrifice the freaking main character because life is cruel and heartless goddammit!
I could literally write another essay on why this particular ending sucked balls, but before some anon messages me saying "omgg it's veronica's book and her ending was so tragic but so byootiful don't you know you're not allowed to hate it??!
This is literally all I ask of any author of any novel. From just a character perspective, it makes sense that Tris would sacrifice herself for the greater good.
That's just what she, as a selflessly reckless person, would do. We already know that Tris is a character who's willing to sacrifice herself for the greater good.
Did we learn any new information about her character when she decided to make this sacrifice? Wouldn't we have gained a better perspective of Caleb if he had made this choice instead?
And most importantly, wouldn't sparing Tris's life allow the final conclusion of this trilogy to be more sound, less rushed, and less overshadowed by the her death?
Tris's sacrifice comes off as being meaningless because she doesn't save anyone from dying. Had she failed to using the memory serum, the worst thing that would have happened was that Chicago would have been reset and the main conflict would have disappeared completely.
And that doesn't even matter in the end because all the major characters that we are supposed to care about were already inoculated against the memory serum anyway.
In fact, by stealing the memory serum, Tris effectively tosses up the fate of Chicago in the air. The careless way her death is written and revealed makes the ending look like it was purely written simply for a cheap shock value.
Cue the forced emotional and dramatic ending where readers drown in a puddle of their feels as we're forced to read Four's tragic reaction to her death.
The last few chapters, including the epilogue, are incredibly rushed. Literally every single issue in the growing mountain of problems that accumulated over the course of this book are immediately solved without any further complications or commentary because deus ex machina.
The ending is far from being the worst thing about this book, but I did read the author's blog post about what she was aiming for. Keeping her intentions in mind, I still think this ending failed in it's execution.
Primarily, the inorganic way that the events are revealed crushes the effect this ending was trying to achieve. Another blatant plot hole I'm baffled over: Tris discovers that her mother was brought in from the outside to rescue Divergents who were being killed by Jeanine's predecessor.
Then later on, it is revealed that the Bureau supplied Jeanine with the attack simulation serum she used to massacre the Abnegation.
So the Bureau is apparently so cautious and protective of every Divergent life that they are willing to send in one of their own to save as many of them as possible, but helping Jeanine massacre an entire faction that contains Divergents is totally ok with them?
Why is this link between the Bureau and Jeanine established but never explained at length? Did it show us anything other than the fact that this book is riddled with more plot holes?
View all comments. I may never be happy ever again. The fun and laughter is over. I have finally read Allegiant, and I feel empty inside.
Empty but accepting, and understanding. This book makes Mockingjay feel like Dr Seuss. I had a few problems with it mainly that it spelled out a bit too much for the reader, lacked finesse with the handling of themes, and was sometimes pretty predictable but the character development was breathtaking, the plot was heart-pounding and since it's a young adult novel, I think Veroni I may never be happy ever again.
I had a few problems with it mainly that it spelled out a bit too much for the reader, lacked finesse with the handling of themes, and was sometimes pretty predictable but the character development was breathtaking, the plot was heart-pounding and since it's a young adult novel, I think Veronica Roth did a pretty damn decent job: Most readers are going to love it.
Who gives a shit about the technicalities. We're all here crying read: But it's like half of me wants to worship this majestic object and the other half wants to fling the beast into the faces of my enemies.
Just like the characters in the book, the grief wipes away any deep philosophical mulling I might have about what happened in the plot.
All that matters is the grief and the death in the end. Veronica makes that point pretty damn clear. War is never romantic. Going against your government?
Because the subsequent grief To all those currently reading the book, see you in hell, comrades. And to those crying and limp on their beds now, welcome my friends.
This part is for those who have read the book. I disagree with a hell lot of complaints made about this book, and this is why: However, I don't think that just because we hate the death doesn't mean that this book "totally sucks".
Veronica Roth, unfortunately, does not owe us a HEA. Because of this, I just want to put my thoughts out there about what some people are saying.
The genetic project that created the genetically damaged people is legitimate A dystopia is the complete opposite of a utopia, which is a perfect society.
More fundamentally, dystopias form as a result of utopian societies gone wrong. Looking at our world right now, it's easy to see the flaws in people.
We look at the government and see selfishness. We look at people around us and see pride. In fact, everywhere we look, we see the flaws in humanity.
And most of us are not at peace with it. We as a society see that selfishness, that irrationality and pride and it makes us angry. This is our real life response.
It is not difficult to see a society dedicated to getting rid of these traits. In fact, it's shockingly, astounding easy to.
That's her utopia going bad. The failure of the genetic experiment is her commentary on human beings non acceptance of human nature.
We do not accept selfishness, stupidity, pride, as part of us. We want to get rid of it. And when faced with the chance to be rid of it, we would probably take it.
And by essentially playing God, in our rejection of the darkness in each and every one of us, we created bigger monsters.
The forming of the factions were a perfectly valid solution to the problem caused by the genetically damaged.
This is absolutely crucial to understand. Doesn't it just breed MORE genetically damaged individuals? It doesn't make any sense! Put yourself in the shoes of one of those who were not genetically damaged.
Who were still perfectly imperfect. The government is going to close off those twisted human beings and basically breed them in large labs, letting them multiply?
Why not just kill them all? After all, they aren't actually human. They aren't God's intention. As a result of human's tampering, human beings have have created unnatural versions of themselves.
The reason why the genetically damaged are prejudiced against and disadvantaged in this society is because they are regarded as less human.
All those people in those factions, in the eyes of everyone else who knows of their unnatural state, are considered nothing more than experiments gone wrong to so many.
The Civil Wars were to eradicate the experiments. However, human beings have a conscience. Most of us know, deep down, that the genetically altered deserve a chance to make their own choices.
Society had made a mistake in playing god once, and suffered horribly for it. Society would not make the same mistake again. The American Government in Allegiant would not make two wrongs in hopes of getting a right.
And eradicating an entire generation of living breathing beings is most certainly playing god, and most certainly on par as wrong.
And if they could not kill the genetically damaged, they sure as hell would try and find a way where the genetically damaged could survive, thrive and find their own humanity.
These subsequent projects involving factions were society's grappling apology. They are trying to fix what they have done.
You do not get to erase the past. Correlating with this thread, society would NOT try and correct these genes again. Why would a society which has already suffered the repercussions of playing god repeat the exact same thing again?
And if they could not fix them, and they could not kill them, what other choice did they have? This entire book revolves around the question on whether the gentically damaged were less human, and it left YOU to decide for yourself.
How could they expect the genetically damaged to just fix themselves by creating random divergents? This concept is more difficult to grasp because it requires knowledge in biology.
Populations can fix themselves as a result of natural selection and selective pressure. Basically, the genetically damaged are less likely to survive, while the divergent are more likely too.
As a result, the divergents would be more likely to survive into adulthood, reproduce and eventually there will be a larger proportion of divergents as compared to the others.
The Divergent themselves crop up as a result of genetic mutation or genetic healing. Your genes can change. The world didn't start with one basic template for every trait that ever existed.
The different hair colors, different physical traits today more likely began as mutations and then thrived under natural selection and selective pressure.
This should have been explained better in the book, absolutely. The whole shebang with the memory serum raises a hell lot of important questions and are not supposed to be a pretty solution wrapped in a silk bow.
The conflict Tris faced with the morality of the memory serum is real. Is it right to remove one's memory? Removing one's memory brings with it dozens of ethical issues.
Does it remove Free Will? Are the memory-altered the same people as they were before then? Can you convict a person who has done a crime even if they don't remember what they have done?
Who has the right to alter someone's memory? Is it playing God? Has technology gone to far today, and should society limit what it could do?
Do the ends justify the means? And does the "Greater Good" even exist, or are things either just right or wrong? These questions are for all of us to think about.
It's not just a problem-solution thing here guys. We cannot look at it simply, or we'll be missing the point completely. It's not about leaving them to kill themselves: It's about giving them a choice to make their own mistakes and staying true to who they are.
Personally I don't feel like Veronica Roth handled these themes with as much finesse as I would like, but for a YA novel I'll let it go. Evelyn's decision to choose her son over everything she's worked for was monumental.
Again, if you look at it simply, you will not see what is trying to be said. For me, I think Veronica is trying to show you the power of maternal love a very strong theme in Harry Potter as well , the complexity of humanity, the ability to change your decisions and actions, the effect of abuse and how the abusee can turn into the abuser, and finally the sharp contrast between Evelyn and Marcus.
Both Evelyn and Marcus are genetically damaged people, aka deemed less human or inhuman altogether. For Marcus, he is the perfect example of how the genetic alteration experiment has created monsters.
Marcus is twisted and rid of humanity. He, we can easily deem as inhuman. But one man's twisted character does not determine those of his kind.
Evelyn is just as genetically altered, and yet she overcame her genetic deficiencies. Her genes did not determine her actions despite the fact that she was designed and made that way.
Her decision to choose her son was not simply a cheesy act of love. It was an epic bitchslap to her genetic makeup. Evelyn defied her supposed destiny and carved out another on her own.
Actually, I was pointed out in the comments that Marcus was Divergent, something I completely forgot! That just draws an even sharper contrast between Evelyn and Marcus which better questions just how much control our genetic makeup has over our actions.
Evelyn, despite being inherently inhuman, was indefinitely more human than Marcus, who was altogether healed. This just shows us how evil can exist in any of us, just as good can.
This raises one more big question. Is Caleb's betrayal justified because he was genetically altered?
Are any of the actions of the genetically altered justified? Or were they just as much their choices instead of simply their genetic code?
And finally, Tris' death. Hell on roller skates, mop my tears for a sec. To be honest, I don't want to ponder too much about her death because its purpose feels highly subjective to everyone's personal interpretation to me.
However, I feel like it was right that she died as who she was and not a shadow of herself. Tris' ultimate sacrifice for love and the greater good was who she is.
If we were to have our Happily Ever After, we would have with us a false caricature of Tris. This is who she is, and we cannot deny our loved ones their own choices and their very nature.
I felt that her seeing her mother at the very end was absolutely beautiful, and negates any argument that says that she died meaninglessly. She died still swinging and living life true to who she is, and she reunited with her loved ones.
Hell, this means she probably reunited with Uriah too in the end, and that makes me cry all the more harder. Well these are my thoughts, feel free to comment below on your own!
This is a support group my friends, we're all in this highly-traumatized, post-Allegiant state together: We don't even know the title!
And I'm so bloody excited! In the case of Allegiant , I think it went a little beyond that. Hours after finishing and sleeping on my crushing disappointment, I have to admit that very little of this book worked for me.
The World Building When you think about both Divergent and Insurgent , there was very little actual world building that went on.
We established the faction system and the way it functions in Divergent. We also established the problems inherent with that system.
In Insurgent , we explored those problems more by watching the breakdown. Then, we get to Allegiant. Everything in the video is a lie so, in a lot of ways, everything Tris did at the end of Insurgent was for nothing.
The outside world is basically Chicago 2. Basically, we have one book to learn the mass of information we need to know about the outside.
This info dump is compounded by several things: This is clearly supposed to be far into the future - at least seven generations? We knew that because of the fact that Chicago was clearly recognizable.
But knowing that everything on the outside is basically still functioning through our government and that the same kinds of issues still cause problems?
Something about that made me question every piece of information thrown at me. There was too much information introduced in this book for it to be the closing of a series and I honestly think this whole series would have benefited from a fourth book.
The background characters None of the background characters went anywhere significant. I did not learn anything new about Cara, Christina, or Uriah.
I could have eliminated all three of them from this book and everything would have been the same. Peter and Caleb showed no growth or change.
Peter proved that he is still the same coward he has always been and yet somehow he gets exactly what he wants. Caleb, too, proved a coward.
As for Natalie Prior, I thought her backstory was interesting. There was a rash of seemingly senseless deaths in this book.
To show that the factionless show as little regard for human life as the Erudite did? The same thing with Tori, who died, it seems, simply to provide the moment in which we find out how wrong she was and that her brother now has to deal with her death?
This problem ties back to the world-building problem and the need for another book. We are introduced to so many new characters.
The people from the Fringe? We barely learn anything besides their names. Then we get to Nita, who plays a major role and then just seems to disappear.
Matthew has a nice little speech about the Terrible thing that genetic prejudice caused to happen, but who is also basically a clone of Cara.
And David, who is exactly, exactly like Jeanine. Having so many new people cut out our chance to see the people that mattered. Tris Tris came a long way in Insurgent and she learned a lot of things.
I thought, overall, she was doing well and continuing that trend until the end, which ruined everything. But here was my problem with Tris: Those mistakes made Tris human.
She is smart and strong and skilled and canny and selfless to a ridiculous extent. And he kind of is. Fundamentally, we had to learn everything new through both characters because obviously they reacted differently to everything.
This really slowed down the pacing and bogged this book down in repetitive backstory. His sections of the book were indistinguishable in both tone and voice.
Though Tris and Four complimented each other so well in the first two books - made an excellent team of equals - they are also very different personality types.
Sure, they have similar characteristics - the same kinds of things make them tick - but they go about things in a very different way.
I didn't find Four likable in this book. I got flashes of the Four I loved, but he was so mired down in all of his weaknesses that reading his portions of the book was really hard.
He is the one that was so mad at Tris in the last book for lying, and he is the one that told her at that he should trust her and not hide things from her.
He has Major Issues. However, I knew that about him already. We already watched this struggle with the need to do something to make the world better and also the need to protect Tris and be a good man in the face of incredibly difficult choices.
We spent a book watching him deal with his feelings for his mother and father, even if we never watched him deal with those things from this point of view.
It was wrenching, but it made him grow. This Four is broken. He has lost all of the defining elements that made him Four. He is weak and indecisive and insecure and, most surprisingly of all, irrational.
Here, his decision makes no sense. He barely knows Nita. Why is he not working with Cara and Christina and Tris? Why is he not asking that they be involved?
It made no sense to me, even in context of losing his identity. And then, his actions and his part in this plan are ignored? There are no consequences aside from the fact that Uriah is unconscious and ultimately dies.
That entire plot point just seemed pointless. Tris is going to be plenty mad about Four being so stupid already; Four is going to feel plenty guilty about acting like a completely naive hayseed without Uriah having to eat it.
Then the issue became about Uriah instead of why on earth he made this ridiculous decision and what he was feeling. After this incredibly boneheaded and uncharacteristic decision?
I did not understand his motivations. I did not understand the personality he suddenly exhibited. It felt like he was simply moving forward the plot instead of being Four.
Plus, he spends all of Allegiant being broken down and we never really see him built back up. The Plot This plot was repetitive. In Insurgent , we have to overthrow the tyranny of Jeanine Mathews.
In Allegiant , we have to overthrow the tyranny of Jeanine Mathews 2. It is the same struggle. Of course, on one level that makes sense.
Tris is chasing this problem up the chain. I did appreciate that aspect. The pacing was an issue. It was slowed considerably by the excessive amount of info dumping and also the dual points of view.
It also felt formulaic. And yet, even with the repetition and the predictability and the deus ex machina moments, this plot was a confused mess and most of it was completely unnecessary to where we went.
And good lord the ending of no sense. The holes in this plot were insane. Tris wants those people to know the truth and be free. Wipe the memories of the bureau instead.
Erase their memories of genetic prejudice. We know there are antidotes to basically every serum, from the death serum to the truth serum.
If they inoculate the people in Chiacago, then David and the Bureau can't wipe their memories. At the very least, this seemingly obvious solution buys them time to figure out what the hell to do.
The memory serum is intended to allow the two groups in Chicago to come to an agreement. How on earth does giving Marcus the serum help that goal?
Evelyn will still remember that he beat her. Evelyn will still remember that he beat Tobias. Marcus is just a power hungry dickwad, that's fundamental to him like knowing how to breathe.
Of course, knowing this, we also know that Four is never going to give his mother the memory serum. What is completely unbelievable in the end is that Evelyn - the same Evelyn who has proven herself to be a dictator and a tyrant, who abandoned Four, who lied to Four, who tried to push away the only person who has ever supported Four and believed in him in his entire life, the same person who has been motivated by nothing but hate of the factions with seemingly little thought to her son - is magically made reasonable by love of her son.
And, of course, they go out and shake hands with Johanna and Marcus gets his just desserts because everyone knows he is an evil scumbag bent on power and everything magically works out fine despite the fact that people were rioting in the first chapter and the rest of the factionless are just going to forget their anger because they love Tobias Meanwhile, back in the compound But still, I hoped I was wrong.
I wanted to be wrong. Every single book Tris goes off to do some sacrificial act to save the people she cares about. That is basically all she does in Insurgent.
And what is her lesson at the end of Insurgent? She wants to live. We know she is. Oh, so Tris points a gun to your head to make you give you the backpack?
And you believe her? When he lets her have the backpack - when he lets Tris walk into that chamber? I was disappointed in Tris too, because she stole Caleb's redemption.
Maybe he lives and redeems himself in some other way, though considering he was an accessory to the slaughter of an entire faction, betrayed his sister, and is generally of weak character, why would anyone believe that he can redeem himself in any other way?
So at gunpoint, she steps up to make this sacrifice and we all knew she was going to do it all along and how did Tobias not? I think, when handled correctly, they are touching scenes that teach the reader something.
I think about Dumbledore dying and my chest aches. I think about so many other deaths in books, from Rue in Hunger Games to Bridge to Terebethia, and I know that deaths of characters you love can matter and make a book beautiful and better and teach you things about yourself and the world and love and all of it.
But the death has to matter. In the very rushed end, we find out that people can depend on each other? Can mend each other? But I needed so much more from Tobias at the end to make his loss of Tris worth that message.
Because what was Tris doing? If anything it makes it less so. Harry Potter och de vises sten. Harry Potter och Hemligheternas kammare.
Charlies änglar - Utan hämningar. Valiant och de fjäderlätta hjältarna. Legenden om ugglornas rike. Shrek - Nu och för alltid.
Nalle Puhs film - Nya äventyr i Sjumilaskogen. Framträder som sig själv i denna dokumentärfilm om Michael White , producent för Monty Pythons galna gäng.